Strategic decisions, at their simplest, revolve around two components: (1) Where to compete (positioning in the market) and (2) How to compete (developing and maintaining a competitive edge).

A law firm’s ability to succeed hinges on several factors: its heritage, the geographic or client markets it serves, the services it offers (and in which sectors), and its overall credibility. Most firms’ current market positions are often the cumulative result of past actions of its management, along with incremental adjustments over time, rather than any recent overhaul.

When evaluating a firm’s strategy, it’s crucial to recognize where it currently stands and what practical choices it can make to ensure a profitable path forward. Any proposed change in its market position must be thought through carefully.

This is because significantly altering a firm’s market position typically demands substantial effort and large-scale investment. More often than not, firms tend to focus more on their revenue-driven work and the need to consistently walk on the path of re-positioning takes a back seat. This results in confused market positioning.

Positioning is also linked to market segmentation – which essentially means grouping clients or prospects with broadly similar needs and perceptions of value.

Most of the firms in any country or internationally can fall under several broad-based market positions that are existing or emerging. Although most firms align with one of these, it’s important to emphasize that every firm’s unique history, culture, and heritage may lead it to blend features of more than one category.

The matrix conceptually divides the market into five tiers of law firms (top to bottom), each tier containing one or more “broad-based types.” These five layers align with variations in sustainable competitive advantage, typical performance, profitability, and the kinds of work they attract (from complex, high-value transactions down to more localized, routine legal matters).

1. Top Layer: Market leaders

• Profile: These are the premier, often global, law firms that dominate their markets. They command impressive resources and maintain deep teams across heavy-duty practice areas.

• Competitive Edge: Large-scale leverage, premium branding, and strong influence in legal and regulatory circles.

• Profit Drivers: Handling high-stakes, high-value matters; achieving economies of scale; and fielding industry-leading specialists.

• Challenges: Fending off ambitious challengers eager to penetrate top-tier business.

2. Second Layer: Challengers and boutique

• Challengers:

  • Seek to break into the elite group of top firms.

  • Usually boast of strong profitability, established client bases, and a commitment to innovation or aggressive growth.

  • May not have the brand stature of Market Rulers yet, but often adopt groundbreaking service methods or new market angles.

• Boutique players:

  • Sometimes called “Focus Firms” or “Portfolio Firms,” they concentrate on very specific practice areas, client sectors or even geography.

  • May also be relatively full-service but exploit a distinctive characteristic — such as an unusual geographic footprint, a high-profile brand, or a unique client experience — to differentiate themselves.

  • Their niche focus often yields significant profitability and deep expertise in particular markets or legal specialties.

3. Third Layer: Mass Market, Local Heroes, and Legacy Firms

• Mass Market

  • Thrive on high-volume, lower-margin work, using technology and cost-effective processes.

  • Pricing and brand are their main differentiators.

  • In the future, non-legal entities (like large retail or insurance companies) may further intensify competition in this segment.

• Local Heroes

  • Dominate a specific region, city, or practice niche, often enjoying strong brand recognition in their locality.

  • May exhibit many “top-tier” characteristics in their own domain, though they typically cannot charge premium global rates.

  • Decide whether to remain dominant locally or attempt to expand into the higher-tier market.

• Legacy Firms

  • Historically influential practices that rely on their legacy, reputation, and long-standing client bases.

  • Often viewed as “safe hands” but may be slow to adapt to changing market demands.

  • Risk stagnation if they fail to innovate or respond to evolving client needs.

4. Fourth Layer: Conglomeration and Vanilla Players

• Conglomerations: Typically collections of offices or teams that grew through mergers or acquisitions without fully integrating.

• Vanilla Players

  • General-purpose firms providing a broad range of services, usually lacking a distinctive edge besides relationships and location convenience.

  • Sometimes referred to as “Utility Firms.”

  • Profitability depends on efficiency, controlling overhead, and retaining loyal, local clients. They often mimic the strategies of nearby competitors to avoid falling behind.

5. Fifth Layer: Minor League Firms

• Typically small in size, with even more localized or lower-grade work.

• These firms maintain an essential role by serving small communities or niche markets.

Market positioning is central to any law firm’s strategic development. By understanding its current standing, a firm can more accurately plot a course for the future. Taking the above approach helps clarify which strengths to leverage, what weaknesses to address, and how best to maneuver in a competitive legal landscape.

In a fast evolving policy and regulatory landscape and intense competition, strategic realignment can deliver substantial benefits if carried out thoughtfully and with a clear-eyed assessment of the firm’s capabilities, culture, and market opportunities.

About the author: Aman Abbas is the Founder and CEO of Commwiser.

If you would like your Deals, Columns, Press Releases to be published on Bar & Bench, please fill in the form available here.